<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174415</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s competence to dismiss the appellant, upheld the validity of Regulation 7, found the disciplinary authority&#039;s order sufficient, and justified the High Court&#039;s summary dismissal of the writ petition. Allegations of mala fides were deemed unsubstantiated. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174415</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s competence to dismiss the appellant, upheld the validity of Regulation 7, found the disciplinary authority&#039;s order sufficient, and justified the High Court&#039;s summary dismissal of the writ petition. Allegations of mala fides were deemed unsubstantiated. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>