<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174412</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the orders cancelling the licences of the appellants, and directed the State to bear the costs incurred by the appellants. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for administrative decisions, upholding procedural fairness, and respecting the rights of individuals in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174412</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the orders cancelling the licences of the appellants, and directed the State to bear the costs incurred by the appellants. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for administrative decisions, upholding procedural fairness, and respecting the rights of individuals in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>