<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 934 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to insufficient evidence for duty computation, time limitation constraints, and discrepancies in discount allowances. The judgment emphasized the significance of precise valuation in duty assessment and compliance with statutory limitations in demand enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 934 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to insufficient evidence for duty computation, time limitation constraints, and discrepancies in discount allowances. The judgment emphasized the significance of precise valuation in duty assessment and compliance with statutory limitations in demand enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>