<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 690 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174410</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders passed by the Enforcement Director and the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange. It directed the refund of the amount deposited in the fixed deposit to Smt. Gurmit Kaur Dhillon, concluding that the penalties imposed were not supported by admissible evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 690 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174410</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders passed by the Enforcement Director and the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange. It directed the refund of the amount deposited in the fixed deposit to Smt. Gurmit Kaur Dhillon, concluding that the penalties imposed were not supported by admissible evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>