https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409 The Supreme Court found the writ petition maintainable despite acknowledging an alternative remedy, dismissed the High Court's decision equating the respondent with the State Government, denied the respondent's claims for penal interest and levies, ruled the Pricing Committee decisions not applicable to the respondent, and clarified the interpretation of "royalty." The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment, dismissing the writ petition, ordering the respondent to refund sums received, and pay costs of Rs. 5,000. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:13:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409 The Supreme Court found the writ petition maintainable despite acknowledging an alternative remedy, dismissed the High Court's decision equating the respondent with the State Government, denied the respondent's claims for penal interest and levies, ruled the Pricing Committee decisions not applicable to the respondent, and clarified the interpretation of "royalty." The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment, dismissing the writ petition, ordering the respondent to refund sums received, and pay costs of Rs. 5,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409