https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409 Writ jurisdiction is unavailable to enforce purely contractual monetary claims where an efficacious civil remedy exists and no sufficient public law element is shown. The Pricing Committee described in the text was administrative, not statutory or quasi-judicial, so its decisions did not bind a third party or enlarge entitlement beyond the parties for whom it was constituted. Royalty could not be stretched to include interest, interest on interest, extension fee, penalties, or damages absent express legal authority. The respondent's claim to those additional amounts therefore lacked legal foundation, and the State's position prevailed on maintainability and merits. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:13:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409 Writ jurisdiction is unavailable to enforce purely contractual monetary claims where an efficacious civil remedy exists and no sufficient public law element is shown. The Pricing Committee described in the text was administrative, not statutory or quasi-judicial, so its decisions did not bind a third party or enlarge entitlement beyond the parties for whom it was constituted. Royalty could not be stretched to include interest, interest on interest, extension fee, penalties, or damages absent express legal authority. The respondent's claim to those additional amounts therefore lacked legal foundation, and the State's position prevailed on maintainability and merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174409