https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174406 An allotment exercise remained provisional where the advertisement, application form, and draw expressly made allotment subject to statutory approval of land use; on that basis, no enforceable right to residential plots arose and promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation could not be invoked. The refusal to change land use from industrial to residential was upheld because it was consistent with the planning statute, the Master Plan, and the industrial development policy, and the material did not show arbitrariness or mala fides. File notings and preliminary proposals were insufficient to displace the final decision. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174406 An allotment exercise remained provisional where the advertisement, application form, and draw expressly made allotment subject to statutory approval of land use; on that basis, no enforceable right to residential plots arose and promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation could not be invoked. The refusal to change land use from industrial to residential was upheld because it was consistent with the planning statute, the Master Plan, and the industrial development policy, and the material did not show arbitrariness or mala fides. File notings and preliminary proposals were insufficient to displace the final decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174406