https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404 A Letters Patent appeal under clause 15 lies from a Single Judge's judgment in a petition under Article 226 because that jurisdiction is original in character and the right of appeal is preserved unless expressly excluded. No intra-court appeal lies from a Single Judge's judgment under Article 227 because that provision is supervisory and is expressly outside clause 15. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 only governs first-instance allocation and disposal by a Single Judge; it does not extinguish a Letters Patent appeal in Article 226 matters, but it does not remove the bar in Article 227 matters. The Full Bench view was overruled to the extent it denied appeals in Article 226 proceedings. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404 A Letters Patent appeal under clause 15 lies from a Single Judge's judgment in a petition under Article 226 because that jurisdiction is original in character and the right of appeal is preserved unless expressly excluded. No intra-court appeal lies from a Single Judge's judgment under Article 227 because that provision is supervisory and is expressly outside clause 15. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 only governs first-instance allocation and disposal by a Single Judge; it does not extinguish a Letters Patent appeal in Article 226 matters, but it does not remove the bar in Article 227 matters. The Full Bench view was overruled to the extent it denied appeals in Article 226 proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404