https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404 The Supreme Court held that an appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not lie against an order made in the exercise of the power under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Full Bench case of Shankar Naroba Salunke & Ors. was overruled, except for the conclusion that no appeal lies under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 227. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, does not bar an intra-court appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 226, while clause 15 itself bars an intra-court appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 227. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404 The Supreme Court held that an appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not lie against an order made in the exercise of the power under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Full Bench case of Shankar Naroba Salunke & Ors. was overruled, except for the conclusion that no appeal lies under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 227. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, does not bar an intra-court appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 226, while clause 15 itself bars an intra-court appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge in a petition under Article 227. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174404