<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174403</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and remanding the case for a fresh decision. The court directed the Board to properly address the appellant&#039;s applications to summon witnesses for cross-examination, emphasizing the importance of giving parties an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:40:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174403</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and remanding the case for a fresh decision. The court directed the Board to properly address the appellant&#039;s applications to summon witnesses for cross-examination, emphasizing the importance of giving parties an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>