https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265244 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner seeking relief under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013. The Petitioner failed to meet the payment deadline due to personal difficulties, leading to the Court ruling that defaulters cannot continuously delay tax payments based on personal circumstances. Emphasizing the Parliament's authority to enact tax laws, the Court held that recovery methods need to be legal, rejecting the Petitioner's argument for a specific recovery manner. The Court ruled that the Petitioner had no legal right to demand a specific recovery method, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs imposed on either party. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265244 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner seeking relief under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013. The Petitioner failed to meet the payment deadline due to personal difficulties, leading to the Court ruling that defaulters cannot continuously delay tax payments based on personal circumstances. Emphasizing the Parliament's authority to enact tax laws, the Court held that recovery methods need to be legal, rejecting the Petitioner's argument for a specific recovery manner. The Court ruled that the Petitioner had no legal right to demand a specific recovery method, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs imposed on either party. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265244