https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265243 The High Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the quantum of pre-deposit for hearing. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal due to non-compliance with the stay order, directing the Tribunal to adjudicate on the merits. The appellant, a body corporate under the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976, challenged the demand for service tax on advertisement space sales. The High Court found the appellant's 40% deposit sufficient and permitted the appeal to proceed without further pre-deposit, ensuring a fair hearing on the merits. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265243 The High Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the quantum of pre-deposit for hearing. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal due to non-compliance with the stay order, directing the Tribunal to adjudicate on the merits. The appellant, a body corporate under the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976, challenged the demand for service tax on advertisement space sales. The High Court found the appellant's 40% deposit sufficient and permitted the appeal to proceed without further pre-deposit, ensuring a fair hearing on the merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265243