<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 513 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265238</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Revision Case, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the Additional Commissioner&#039;s order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid for adhering to legal precedents, contrasting with the Additional Commissioner&#039;s lack of fresh material and failure to address this deficiency in the revision. Despite ruling in favor of the respondent, the Tribunal raised concerns about the assessing authority&#039;s jurisdiction and the timeliness of exercising revisional powers. The Court declined to assess whether the revisional authority&#039;s order constituted a second revision, leading to the dismissal of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 513 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265238</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Revision Case, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the Additional Commissioner&#039;s order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid for adhering to legal precedents, contrasting with the Additional Commissioner&#039;s lack of fresh material and failure to address this deficiency in the revision. Despite ruling in favor of the respondent, the Tribunal raised concerns about the assessing authority&#039;s jurisdiction and the timeliness of exercising revisional powers. The Court declined to assess whether the revisional authority&#039;s order constituted a second revision, leading to the dismissal of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>