https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265227 The Court applied stare decisis and treated the controversy as squarely governed by the ratio in Nizam Sugar Factory v. Collector of Central Excise. Because the earlier authoritative ruling controlled the point in issue, the Court declined to reopen or independently re-examine the settled question and dismissed the appeals. The document reflects the binding force of precedent where the same legal issue has already been ated by a controlling decision. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 07:29:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265227 The Court applied stare decisis and treated the controversy as squarely governed by the ratio in Nizam Sugar Factory v. Collector of Central Excise. Because the earlier authoritative ruling controlled the point in issue, the Court declined to reopen or independently re-examine the settled question and dismissed the appeals. The document reflects the binding force of precedent where the same legal issue has already been ated by a controlling decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265227