<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 500 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265225</link>
    <description>Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 was held inapplicable where goods were partly sold at the factory gate and partly cleared for captive consumption. The Court concluded that the valuation rule did not apply on those facts, so the assessee&#039;s position remained undisturbed and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 07:29:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 500 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265225</link>
      <description>Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 was held inapplicable where goods were partly sold at the factory gate and partly cleared for captive consumption. The Court concluded that the valuation rule did not apply on those facts, so the assessee&#039;s position remained undisturbed and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>