<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 483 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal excluded certain companies from the list of comparables, resulting in a lower arithmetic mean margin than the appellant&#039;s. As a result, no adjustment to the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) was deemed necessary. The Tribunal directed adherence to a previous High Court decision regarding the exclusion of expenses from both export turnover and total turnover for Section 10A computation. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 07:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 483 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal excluded certain companies from the list of comparables, resulting in a lower arithmetic mean margin than the appellant&#039;s. As a result, no adjustment to the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) was deemed necessary. The Tribunal directed adherence to a previous High Court decision regarding the exclusion of expenses from both export turnover and total turnover for Section 10A computation. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>