<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=600</link>
    <description>Chillers manufactured by the assessee were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 84.18 as refrigerating or freezing equipment, not under Chapter Heading 84.15 as air-conditioning machines or parts. The decisive test was the goods&#039; intrinsic character and primary function: the chillers operated through a refrigerating circuit to produce chilled water or liquid, and that essential character was not altered by later use in air-conditioning or industrial systems. End use by customers could not control classification where a specific tariff entry matched the product&#039;s essential nature. Trade parlance also supported treatment as refrigerating equipment, and the Revenue&#039;s classification under Heading 84.15 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=600</link>
      <description>Chillers manufactured by the assessee were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 84.18 as refrigerating or freezing equipment, not under Chapter Heading 84.15 as air-conditioning machines or parts. The decisive test was the goods&#039; intrinsic character and primary function: the chillers operated through a refrigerating circuit to produce chilled water or liquid, and that essential character was not altered by later use in air-conditioning or industrial systems. End use by customers could not control classification where a specific tariff entry matched the product&#039;s essential nature. Trade parlance also supported treatment as refrigerating equipment, and the Revenue&#039;s classification under Heading 84.15 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>