<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 923 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174397</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals were found non-maintainable because the amounts in dispute fell below the monetary threshold prescribed in the Board circular governing departmental appeals. The binding precedent relied upon was applied, and the fact that the appeals had been filed earlier did not cure the maintainability defect. As a result, the tribunal rejected the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 923 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174397</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals were found non-maintainable because the amounts in dispute fell below the monetary threshold prescribed in the Board circular governing departmental appeals. The binding precedent relied upon was applied, and the fact that the appeals had been filed earlier did not cure the maintainability defect. As a result, the tribunal rejected the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>