<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 6 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=596</link>
    <description>Physician&#039;s free samples of identical medicaments are to be valued by reference to comparable commercial packs under rule 6(b)(i) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975, because non-sold goods must first be valued against comparable goods with reasonable adjustments for material differences. The smaller pack size and different labelling for non-sale did not change the essential characteristics of the medicines, so the samples remained materially comparable to sold packs. The cost method under rule 6(b)(ii) applies only as a residual measure when value cannot reasonably be determined under rule 6(b)(i), and Chapter Note 5 of Chapter 30 did not justify a different valuation approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 6 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=596</link>
      <description>Physician&#039;s free samples of identical medicaments are to be valued by reference to comparable commercial packs under rule 6(b)(i) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975, because non-sold goods must first be valued against comparable goods with reasonable adjustments for material differences. The smaller pack size and different labelling for non-sale did not change the essential characteristics of the medicines, so the samples remained materially comparable to sold packs. The cost method under rule 6(b)(ii) applies only as a residual measure when value cannot reasonably be determined under rule 6(b)(i), and Chapter Note 5 of Chapter 30 did not justify a different valuation approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>