<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 332 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174396</link>
    <description>Presidential clemency under Article 72 is a constitutional executive power distinct from judicial power, and the President may examine the merits and evidence of a finally decided criminal case without altering the judicial record. A condemned person has no enforceable right to an oral hearing on a mercy petition, though one may be granted at discretion. The Court found no need for additional judicially framed guidelines because the constitutional text and existing case law were sufficient. It also declined to reopen the settled constitutional validity of the death penalty, and the mercy petition was to be reconsidered in light of the ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:49:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 332 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174396</link>
      <description>Presidential clemency under Article 72 is a constitutional executive power distinct from judicial power, and the President may examine the merits and evidence of a finally decided criminal case without altering the judicial record. A condemned person has no enforceable right to an oral hearing on a mercy petition, though one may be granted at discretion. The Court found no need for additional judicially framed guidelines because the constitutional text and existing case law were sufficient. It also declined to reopen the settled constitutional validity of the death penalty, and the mercy petition was to be reconsidered in light of the ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>