https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174392 Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was construed as conferring wide revisional power on the State Government to examine legality, regularity and propriety of subordinate transport orders. Propriety was held to include a merits-based assessment of whether, in the statutory scheme and public interest, the permit should be granted to the applicant with better operational facilities, even if the subordinate authorities had taken a different view. The provision was also upheld as valid, and no patent error or excess of jurisdiction was shown to justify certiorari under article 226. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:26:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174392 Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was construed as conferring wide revisional power on the State Government to examine legality, regularity and propriety of subordinate transport orders. Propriety was held to include a merits-based assessment of whether, in the statutory scheme and public interest, the permit should be granted to the applicant with better operational facilities, even if the subordinate authorities had taken a different view. The provision was also upheld as valid, and no patent error or excess of jurisdiction was shown to justify certiorari under article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174392