<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1104 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 54 for both flats purchased by the assessee, considering them as a single residential unit. The Tribunal emphasized that the intention of the assessee to purchase two flats as one unit should be considered for granting the exemption under section 54, based on precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1104 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 54 for both flats purchased by the assessee, considering them as a single residential unit. The Tribunal emphasized that the intention of the assessee to purchase two flats as one unit should be considered for granting the exemption under section 54, based on precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>