<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1147 - CESTAT BANGLORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order due to the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to address crucial matters and denied the appellant&#039;s request for cross-examination of witnesses. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The Tribunal refrained from expressing views on the case&#039;s merits, allowing the adjudicating authority to reevaluate all issues. All appeals were allowed through remand, providing an opportunity for a more thorough examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:11:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1147 - CESTAT BANGLORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order due to the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to address crucial matters and denied the appellant&#039;s request for cross-examination of witnesses. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The Tribunal refrained from expressing views on the case&#039;s merits, allowing the adjudicating authority to reevaluate all issues. All appeals were allowed through remand, providing an opportunity for a more thorough examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>