<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1384 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174372</link>
    <description>For a partition decree, limitation for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act begins when the final decree becomes legally enforceable, not when it is later engrossed on stamp paper and signed. The Court held that the word &quot;enforceable&quot; means capable of execution, so ministerial steps such as furnishing stamp paper do not postpone or suspend limitation. Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act operates in a different field and does not control the commencement of limitation for execution. Accordingly, delay by the decree-holder in completing stamp-related formalities cannot extend time, and the execution petition was held time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1384 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174372</link>
      <description>For a partition decree, limitation for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act begins when the final decree becomes legally enforceable, not when it is later engrossed on stamp paper and signed. The Court held that the word &quot;enforceable&quot; means capable of execution, so ministerial steps such as furnishing stamp paper do not postpone or suspend limitation. Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act operates in a different field and does not control the commencement of limitation for execution. Accordingly, delay by the decree-holder in completing stamp-related formalities cannot extend time, and the execution petition was held time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>