https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=591 The judgment set aside confiscation and penalties for Appellant No.1, a manufacturer, due to lack of evidence for clandestine removal. Appellant Nos. 2 & 3 were granted a remand as the appellate authority failed to provide findings and did not consider duty paying documents. The case concluded by allowing the appeal of Appellant No.1 and remanding the appeals of Appellant Nos. 2 & 3 for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=591 The judgment set aside confiscation and penalties for Appellant No.1, a manufacturer, due to lack of evidence for clandestine removal. Appellant Nos. 2 & 3 were granted a remand as the appellate authority failed to provide findings and did not consider duty paying documents. The case concluded by allowing the appeal of Appellant No.1 and remanding the appeals of Appellant Nos. 2 & 3 for further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=591