https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174368 Disciplinary termination of workmen was treated as punitive in substance where the management relied on alleged misconduct and the strike background, so the orders could not be sustained as discharge simpliciter without individual charge-sheets, enquiry, and proof of personal culpability. The majority further held that an arbitrator under a Section 10-A industrial reference could apply Section 11-A principles to review dismissal and punishment, while the dissent disagreed. On judicial review, the majority held that the High Court could interfere under Articles 226 and 227 where the award rested on mass guilt and procedural illegality, and could mould final relief rather than remand the matter. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:51:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174368 Disciplinary termination of workmen was treated as punitive in substance where the management relied on alleged misconduct and the strike background, so the orders could not be sustained as discharge simpliciter without individual charge-sheets, enquiry, and proof of personal culpability. The majority further held that an arbitrator under a Section 10-A industrial reference could apply Section 11-A principles to review dismissal and punishment, while the dissent disagreed. On judicial review, the majority held that the High Court could interfere under Articles 226 and 227 where the award rested on mass guilt and procedural illegality, and could mould final relief rather than remand the matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174368