<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 62 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174363</link>
    <description>Payment to a purported profit sharer was held not deductible under Section 10(2)(xv) because the sums advanced were from third parties, the formal postdated agreement lacked commercial substance, and there were no genuine advances by the payee; the arrangement operated as a diversion or distribution of profits rather than an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for carrying on business, so the payment is not allowable as a business deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 62 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174363</link>
      <description>Payment to a purported profit sharer was held not deductible under Section 10(2)(xv) because the sums advanced were from third parties, the formal postdated agreement lacked commercial substance, and there were no genuine advances by the payee; the arrangement operated as a diversion or distribution of profits rather than an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for carrying on business, so the payment is not allowable as a business deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>