<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 due to lack of jurisdictional foundation, as the Assessing Officer (AO) did not establish any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all necessary material facts. Consequently, the additions made by the AO and the charging of interest under section 234B were rendered infructuous. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 due to lack of jurisdictional foundation, as the Assessing Officer (AO) did not establish any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all necessary material facts. Consequently, the additions made by the AO and the charging of interest under section 234B were rendered infructuous. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>