<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 924 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174349</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found no infirmity in the impugned judgment and order, holding that no error of law or jurisdictional defect was shown to justify interference. As the reasoning and conclusions of the court below were upheld as sound, the civil appeals were dismissed and no remand or reversal was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 09:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 924 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174349</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found no infirmity in the impugned judgment and order, holding that no error of law or jurisdictional defect was shown to justify interference. As the reasoning and conclusions of the court below were upheld as sound, the civil appeals were dismissed and no remand or reversal was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>