https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174348 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that internal circulars issued by the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) do not have the force of law and cannot unilaterally alter the terms of concluded contracts unless explicitly incorporated. The Court emphasized the importance of clear and mutual agreement on contractual terms, finding DOT's demands based on internal circulars unjustified. The judgments of the Tribunal were upheld, with the Court ruling that the appeals did not present any substantial question of law warranting interference. en-us Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174348 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that internal circulars issued by the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) do not have the force of law and cannot unilaterally alter the terms of concluded contracts unless explicitly incorporated. The Court emphasized the importance of clear and mutual agreement on contractual terms, finding DOT's demands based on internal circulars unjustified. The judgments of the Tribunal were upheld, with the Court ruling that the appeals did not present any substantial question of law warranting interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174348