<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RE-ADJUDICATION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6472</link>
    <description>Remands may be for de novo consideration or for a restricted purpose; the adjudicator must confine fresh proceedings to the scope specified in the remand and may not re-open issues concluded by the appellate order. Interim directions likely to prejudice merits should not be imposed when remanding. Principles of natural justice require supply of documents relied upon and opportunity to respond and adduce evidence during re-adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:59:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:59:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RE-ADJUDICATION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6472</link>
      <description>Remands may be for de novo consideration or for a restricted purpose; the adjudicator must confine fresh proceedings to the scope specified in the remand and may not re-open issues concluded by the appellate order. Interim directions likely to prejudice merits should not be imposed when remanding. Principles of natural justice require supply of documents relied upon and opportunity to respond and adduce evidence during re-adjudication.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:59:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>