<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand for &quot;Management Consultant Service.&quot; The decision was based on the lack of jurisdiction of the Allahabad Commissionerate, the failure to demonstrate how the services provided constituted Management Consultancy Service, and the absence of evidence supporting the classification of services under the taxable category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 20:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 456 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand for &quot;Management Consultant Service.&quot; The decision was based on the lack of jurisdiction of the Allahabad Commissionerate, the failure to demonstrate how the services provided constituted Management Consultancy Service, and the absence of evidence supporting the classification of services under the taxable category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>