<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 451 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265176</link>
    <description>A High Court may decline to exercise territorial jurisdiction over a writ petition if another High Court is the more appropriate forum on the facts. Where the dispute has a substantial local element, the parties and business are based elsewhere, and departmental remedies have already been pursued there, the forum conveniens principle may justify refusal to entertain the petition. The challenge to tax recovery and attachment was therefore left to be pursued before the more suitable forum, without the merits being examined in this court, subject only to limited interim protection against remittance of the attached amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 451 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265176</link>
      <description>A High Court may decline to exercise territorial jurisdiction over a writ petition if another High Court is the more appropriate forum on the facts. Where the dispute has a substantial local element, the parties and business are based elsewhere, and departmental remedies have already been pursued there, the forum conveniens principle may justify refusal to entertain the petition. The challenge to tax recovery and attachment was therefore left to be pursued before the more suitable forum, without the merits being examined in this court, subject only to limited interim protection against remittance of the attached amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>