<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 446 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265171</link>
    <description>An assessee cannot be fastened with differential duty or extended limitation for undervaluation of grey fabric where merchant manufacturers disclosed the lower value and the assessee had no knowledge of the true value. The demand was based on alleged undervaluation by third-party suppliers, but the record showed that the lesser value was disclosed by those suppliers themselves. On those facts, the Tribunal correctly absolved the assessee of liability, and the SC affirmed that view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 446 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265171</link>
      <description>An assessee cannot be fastened with differential duty or extended limitation for undervaluation of grey fabric where merchant manufacturers disclosed the lower value and the assessee had no knowledge of the true value. The demand was based on alleged undervaluation by third-party suppliers, but the record showed that the lesser value was disclosed by those suppliers themselves. On those facts, the Tribunal correctly absolved the assessee of liability, and the SC affirmed that view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>