<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265163</link>
    <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed because the matter was stated to be squarely covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment delivered the same day in C.A. No. 1296/2005. No separate reasoning on the merits was set out in this order, and the dismissal followed the earlier binding determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265163</link>
      <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed because the matter was stated to be squarely covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment delivered the same day in C.A. No. 1296/2005. No separate reasoning on the merits was set out in this order, and the dismissal followed the earlier binding determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>