<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 424 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265149</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the civil appeals but found no merit in the challenge. The appeals were therefore dismissed. The order does not record any detailed legal reasoning on the underlying central excise issues and reflects only the Court&#039;s refusal to interfere after considering the parties&#039; submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 424 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265149</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the civil appeals but found no merit in the challenge. The appeals were therefore dismissed. The order does not record any detailed legal reasoning on the underlying central excise issues and reflects only the Court&#039;s refusal to interfere after considering the parties&#039; submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>