<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 404 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265129</link>
    <description>The court partly allowed the appeal. The issues regarding the annual subscription for education fund and the addition of cane penalty recoverable from farmers were decided in favor of the revenue. On the other hand, the questions concerning the contribution towards the rehabilitation fund and the contribution towards the construction of the office building were answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 404 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265129</link>
      <description>The court partly allowed the appeal. The issues regarding the annual subscription for education fund and the addition of cane penalty recoverable from farmers were decided in favor of the revenue. On the other hand, the questions concerning the contribution towards the rehabilitation fund and the contribution towards the construction of the office building were answered in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>