<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265126</link>
    <description>The High Court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and upheld the deletion of additions on account of advance against order and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The Court found no legal issue in the decisions made by the Tribunal, emphasizing the significance of factual evidence and adherence to tax laws in determining tax liabilities. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s rulings on the disputed additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265126</link>
      <description>The High Court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and upheld the deletion of additions on account of advance against order and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The Court found no legal issue in the decisions made by the Tribunal, emphasizing the significance of factual evidence and adherence to tax laws in determining tax liabilities. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s rulings on the disputed additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>