<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 396 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265121</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi set aside the order of CIT(A)/DRP in a transfer pricing dispute involving characterization of the assessee&#039;s business model and selection of comparables. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s contention regarding differing intensity of functions in AE and non-AE transactions, crucial for proper functional characterization, had not been examined either by the TPO or DRP. As this omission undermined the entire basis for the TP adjustment and for exclusion/retention of comparables, the impugned order was vacated. All issues raised in both assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were remanded to AO/TPO for de novo adjudication with a speaking order after affording adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 396 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265121</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi set aside the order of CIT(A)/DRP in a transfer pricing dispute involving characterization of the assessee&#039;s business model and selection of comparables. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s contention regarding differing intensity of functions in AE and non-AE transactions, crucial for proper functional characterization, had not been examined either by the TPO or DRP. As this omission undermined the entire basis for the TP adjustment and for exclusion/retention of comparables, the impugned order was vacated. All issues raised in both assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were remanded to AO/TPO for de novo adjudication with a speaking order after affording adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>