<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 376 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265101</link>
    <description>Promotion rules with separate fixed quotas for degree holders and diploma holders required qualifying service to be rendered within the relevant category. Diploma-holder Project Engineers (Junior) who later acquired AMIE could not count pre-AMIE service toward eligibility under the degree-holder quota, because the scheme treated the two streams as distinct promotional compartments and did not permit inter-changeability absent express rule-based authorization. Separate seniority lists were not required; common entry-level seniority remained governed by the recruitment process, while quota-specific eligibility could be assessed separately for promotion purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 376 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265101</link>
      <description>Promotion rules with separate fixed quotas for degree holders and diploma holders required qualifying service to be rendered within the relevant category. Diploma-holder Project Engineers (Junior) who later acquired AMIE could not count pre-AMIE service toward eligibility under the degree-holder quota, because the scheme treated the two streams as distinct promotional compartments and did not permit inter-changeability absent express rule-based authorization. Separate seniority lists were not required; common entry-level seniority remained governed by the recruitment process, while quota-specific eligibility could be assessed separately for promotion purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>