https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174346 The Supreme Court held that the Board's residuary regulation-making power under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 covered service matters arising from its functions. Section 79(c) was treated as limited to duties, salaries, allowances and other service conditions, while Section 79(k) was read more broadly. Reading Section 15 with Section 79(k), the power to appoint employees was held to include, by necessary implication, power to regulate disciplinary control and termination of service. The regulation governing appointment, discipline and termination was therefore within the Board's competence, and the challenge to its validity failed. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:53:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174346 The Supreme Court held that the Board's residuary regulation-making power under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 covered service matters arising from its functions. Section 79(c) was treated as limited to duties, salaries, allowances and other service conditions, while Section 79(k) was read more broadly. Reading Section 15 with Section 79(k), the power to appoint employees was held to include, by necessary implication, power to regulate disciplinary control and termination of service. The regulation governing appointment, discipline and termination was therefore within the Board's competence, and the challenge to its validity failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174346