https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174345 Under Article 235, the High Court's institutional control over the subordinate judiciary includes regulating how that control is exercised, and it may validly authorise an Administrative Committee of Judges to act on its behalf without impermissible delegation. On the compulsory retirement issue, the Court found no stigma or punitive character in the order, noted sufficient service material to support the decision, and rejected the challenge based on the service regulations. The retirement order was therefore treated as legally sustainable, and the challenge failed. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:44:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174345 Under Article 235, the High Court's institutional control over the subordinate judiciary includes regulating how that control is exercised, and it may validly authorise an Administrative Committee of Judges to act on its behalf without impermissible delegation. On the compulsory retirement issue, the Court found no stigma or punitive character in the order, noted sufficient service material to support the decision, and rejected the challenge based on the service regulations. The retirement order was therefore treated as legally sustainable, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174345