<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1103 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174344</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the consequences ordered against the appellants and remanded the matter for de-novo adjudication. The adjudicating authority was directed to clearly identify shipping bills with non-realized export proceeds, quantify overvaluation reasonably, and ensure that only the ineligible credit utilized for customs duty payment is recovered. The judgment emphasized the need for a thorough and clear re-examination of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1103 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174344</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the consequences ordered against the appellants and remanded the matter for de-novo adjudication. The adjudicating authority was directed to clearly identify shipping bills with non-realized export proceeds, quantify overvaluation reasonably, and ensure that only the ineligible credit utilized for customs duty payment is recovered. The judgment emphasized the need for a thorough and clear re-examination of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>