https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174334 The High Court's direction to call 210 candidates for interview was unsustainable because it treated reserved vacancies as if they would be de-reserved, while the governing rules left any de-reservation or carry-forward decision to the competent authority. The recruitment process could not be expanded on a hypothetical assumption that additional vacancies might later be available, and the procedure adopted was internally inconsistent. The Supreme Court also noted that an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision on identical relief had not been followed or referred for larger Bench consideration, despite the rule that a co-ordinate Bench is bound by an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision unless the matter is so referred. The direction was set aside and the appeals were allowed. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:26:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174334 The High Court's direction to call 210 candidates for interview was unsustainable because it treated reserved vacancies as if they would be de-reserved, while the governing rules left any de-reservation or carry-forward decision to the competent authority. The recruitment process could not be expanded on a hypothetical assumption that additional vacancies might later be available, and the procedure adopted was internally inconsistent. The Supreme Court also noted that an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision on identical relief had not been followed or referred for larger Bench consideration, despite the rule that a co-ordinate Bench is bound by an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision unless the matter is so referred. The direction was set aside and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174334