<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1309 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174332</link>
    <description>The court granted leave for the petitioners to pay excise duty on stainless steel wires made from stainless steel rods until the case&#039;s final disposal. The court emphasized the distinction in manufacturing processes between mild steel and stainless steel wire, allowing for interim relief. The Central Board of Excise and Customs was permitted to consider the differentiation between these processes, setting the stage for further legal deliberations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1309 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174332</link>
      <description>The court granted leave for the petitioners to pay excise duty on stainless steel wires made from stainless steel rods until the case&#039;s final disposal. The court emphasized the distinction in manufacturing processes between mild steel and stainless steel wire, allowing for interim relief. The Central Board of Excise and Customs was permitted to consider the differentiation between these processes, setting the stage for further legal deliberations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>