https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174316 The Supreme Court dismissed both suits with costs, setting aside the decrees of the High Court. It held that Bangaru Ammal's marriage was not in the Asura form, the compromise decree was binding on the plaintiffs, the transfer of C and C-1 Schedule properties was limited to the Melwaram right, and the plaintiffs' claim regarding item 70 of the C Schedule properties was barred by limitation. The Court upheld the presumption that the marriage was in the Brahma form, emphasizing the burden of proof was not met by the plaintiffs. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174316 The Supreme Court dismissed both suits with costs, setting aside the decrees of the High Court. It held that Bangaru Ammal's marriage was not in the Asura form, the compromise decree was binding on the plaintiffs, the transfer of C and C-1 Schedule properties was limited to the Melwaram right, and the plaintiffs' claim regarding item 70 of the C Schedule properties was barred by limitation. The Court upheld the presumption that the marriage was in the Brahma form, emphasizing the burden of proof was not met by the plaintiffs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174316