<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174307</link>
    <description>In disciplinary appeals, compliance with the prescribed notice-and-representation procedure was held sufficient where the service rules did not require a separate oral hearing. The appellate authority&#039;s enhancement of penalty from reduction in basic pay to removal from service was sustained because a show-cause notice was issued, the employee&#039;s written reply was considered, and the record showed application of mind to serious misconduct involving breach of integrity in sanctioning a loan to the employee&#039;s spouse. The plea of natural justice failed, and the enhanced punishment was not treated as disproportionate in view of the abuse of position and breach of trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 571 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174307</link>
      <description>In disciplinary appeals, compliance with the prescribed notice-and-representation procedure was held sufficient where the service rules did not require a separate oral hearing. The appellate authority&#039;s enhancement of penalty from reduction in basic pay to removal from service was sustained because a show-cause notice was issued, the employee&#039;s written reply was considered, and the record showed application of mind to serious misconduct involving breach of integrity in sanctioning a loan to the employee&#039;s spouse. The plea of natural justice failed, and the enhanced punishment was not treated as disproportionate in view of the abuse of position and breach of trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>