<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1009 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars was unjustified. It held that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars and the claim for depreciation was made in good faith, not constituting concealment. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1009 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars was unjustified. It held that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars and the claim for depreciation was made in good faith, not constituting concealment. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>