<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 373 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265098</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Settlement Commission&#039;s order. It held that the Commission acted within its legal powers and emphasized the importance of full disclosure in the settlement process. The petitioners&#039; selective acceptance of allegations and lack of convincing explanations justified the Commission&#039;s decision to remand the matter for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 373 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265098</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Settlement Commission&#039;s order. It held that the Commission acted within its legal powers and emphasized the importance of full disclosure in the settlement process. The petitioners&#039; selective acceptance of allegations and lack of convincing explanations justified the Commission&#039;s decision to remand the matter for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>