<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 368 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the department to pay interest on the sanctioned refund amount. The decision affirmed the application of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, obligating the department to pay interest for delayed refunds beyond the stipulated three-month period, in accordance with established legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 368 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the department to pay interest on the sanctioned refund amount. The decision affirmed the application of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, obligating the department to pay interest for delayed refunds beyond the stipulated three-month period, in accordance with established legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>