https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=568 The appeals were allowed due to the lack of evidence supporting the demands and the violation of Natural Justice principles in the adjudication process. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for confirming demands related to clandestine removal of goods. The failure to comply with the remand order, non-examination of affidavits, and reliance on documents for securing bank loans without evidence of actual manufacture and removal of goods without payment of duty were key factors in setting aside the order confirming the demands. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=568 The appeals were allowed due to the lack of evidence supporting the demands and the violation of Natural Justice principles in the adjudication process. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for confirming demands related to clandestine removal of goods. The failure to comply with the remand order, non-examination of affidavits, and reliance on documents for securing bank loans without evidence of actual manufacture and removal of goods without payment of duty were key factors in setting aside the order confirming the demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=568