<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 363 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265088</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the pre-deposit order by the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits without requiring any additional deposit from the appellant, considering the appellant had already deposited the specified amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 363 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265088</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the pre-deposit order by the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal on its merits without requiring any additional deposit from the appellant, considering the appellant had already deposited the specified amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>